Ben to meet with Bulls

Discussion in 'Pistons and NBA' started by max, Jul 1, 2006.

  1. himat

    himat Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    3,759
    Likes Received:
    1
    This board is goin to blow up if we find out Ben leaves:mad:
  2. mercury

    mercury Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Amish Hood
    So the Pistons are only 4M less than the Bulls for the entire 4 years... that's encouraging... Neither Joe or Ben will let 1M per year let them separate
  3. lurker

    lurker First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    San Diego
    I agree. If the numbers are right, I think it's really good news. If the Bulls wanted to steal Ben, they should have brought a bigger first offer.
  4. TaS

    TaS All-Star Forum Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    17,002
    Likes Received:
    2,476
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Chicaaago
    What would the Bulls do with Chandler and Ben? Play them at the same time? That would be the most stale offense in history. If they get Ben, they should trade TC. But the problem is that they are overpaying Chandler.
  5. ahb

    ahb Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    It's only the initial offer, and I'm a lot more certain that the Bulls will go higher if necessary than I am about the Pistons. But I'm not sure about this at all:
    All other things being equal, why would he take the Pistons' offer over the Bulls'? Loyalty to Joe Dumars? To his teammates? When there's a much more likeable coach and situation and arguably a better team in Chicago? :ohwell:
  6. mercury

    mercury Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Amish Hood
    Cause we've got the cool Big Ben gong.:P
  7. linwood

    linwood All-Star

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    4,283
    Likes Received:
    1,217
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Is Skiles considered "Likeable"?
  8. lurker

    lurker First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    San Diego
    The part I'm having trouble with is that there's "arguably a better team in Chicago."
  9. ahb

    ahb Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    From Ben's perspective as a basketball player, as opposed to one Mr. F. Saunders, I'd have to say yes.
    You don't think Bulls+Ben, maybe+another FA is a championship contender? You do think that the Pistons with Mr. F. Saunders as their head coach, is a championship contender? I'd have to say that should Ben sign with the Bulls, they would easily be the best team in the East; whereas whether Ben returns or not the current Pistons run is over.
  10. lurker

    lurker First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    San Diego
    So you meant that the Bulls would be better with Ben than the Pistons would be without him. But wouldn't that be a consequence of Ben's decision, rather than a justification for it?
  11. Buckeyes#1

    Buckeyes#1 First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    944
    Likes Received:
    14
    Ben's a Piston. This is his final big contract. He needs to get as much as he can for his family. He's not going to jump to the enemy. He just needs to teach Dumars what his trade value is. Nobody knows until the bidding stops. No need to worry. Ben's a lifer. Detroit made Ben. I'm not worried one iota.

    Of course. I wasn't worried about the Pistons losing in the playoffs either. :eyebrows:
  12. Griffin

    Griffin First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was just watching Sports Final Edition (or whatever it's called on channel 4). According to Rob Parker's "moles," the Bulls are offering $60 mill over 4 yrs. They agreed that Ben couldn't turn down that much.
  13. ahb

    ahb Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    So he's definitely going to re-sign with Detroit, then.
  14. coynejeremy

    coynejeremy All-Star Administrator 1x Fantasy Champion Forum Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,904
    Likes Received:
    771
    Location:
    Georgetown, KY
    These "contingency plans" that I'm reading about are not convincing me that it would be REMOTELY worth it to let Ben go. If we're not willing to pay a 4-time All-Star and 3-time DPOY what other teams will, enough to make him WANT to stay here, then what good players WILL we pay enough to make them come here? (When I say 'good' I'm talking about championship-caliber players. Right now the Pistons are like the Redwings and the Yankees in that if they don't win the 'ship, people freak out.)
  15. mercury

    mercury Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Amish Hood
    52M or 60M?
    These beat writers need to face off and compare sources... may the wrong party get terminal writers cramp...that's ridiculous.
  16. Griffin

    Griffin First Round Draft Pick

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2005
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    0
    :laugh: exactly. I mean, if Rob Parker said so...


    Interesting thread over at Pacers Digest about all this. Somebody is claiming that a Hornet's insider is saying a deal is practically done between Det/Chi/NO where basically we get a brokedown PJ Brown and Ben goes to Chi Town. Please, God, let this be false. (The insider supposedly got both the Peja and BJax deals before they went down).

    http://www.pacersdigest.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22066
  17. ahb

    ahb Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    ASB adds this, which is probably the most truthful account yet: ...
    The Chicago Bulls, one of the few teams with the salary cap space to sign Wallace to a bigger contract, met with the 6-foot-9 center on Saturday. It is unclear if the Bulls offered him a contract then, but it's believed that Chicago is willing to give Wallace a multi-year deal that would average close to $15 million per season....

    The mysterious "insider" is No1Hornet here. It seems that he's been reliable with his predictions so far.
  18. lpgrl26

    lpgrl26 Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wish i had your faith

    I'm just waiting for the announcement that he's gone at this point :frusty:
  19. mercury

    mercury Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,396
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Amish Hood
    And why do we want a 37 year old PF (PJ)?
    Only thing I can think of is his expiring deal
  20. lpgrl26

    lpgrl26 Bench Warmer

    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,999
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's the only reason i can think of too.

    We should trade all our players for expiring deals. Just think of the
    money Davidson can save! :smash:

Share This Page