In 04' people said Detroit won, not because of individual talent, but because of the team concept. Now people are saying Detroit has too much talent not to be a much better team than their record indicates. But do they? Was it just the perfect chemistry of coach and players. If so, then really, there is not so much to complain about. So which is it? I don't think both can be true. Talent or chemistry in 04? IMO, the Pistons have decent/average talent. So, they are around .500 right now. Maybe that is exactly where they belong. Screw the switch theory. They win some and they lose some. That is what .500 teams do.